Welcome   Sponsored By
Subscribe | Register | Advertise | Newsletter | About us | Contact us

Image: FiskerForum

Transparency and expertise shortfall in EU taxonomy standards

Tuesday, September 20, 2022, 07:00 (GMT + 9)

The EU Taxonomy aims to become a tool for companies and investors to help identifying those projects and economic activities that have a substantial positive impact on the climate and the environment – but in the case of fisheries this has been slammed having become a ‘wish-list of unrealistic and unachievable targets far removed from reality.’

According to European industry bodies Europêche and EAPO, the expert group for fisheries, set up in 2020, did not include any fishing industry stakeholder – only NGO representatives. As a result, the group produced unrealistic recommendations to the European Commission who is now working on a new bill.

‘This unbalanced situation has led to significant gaps in the platform’s knowledge and expertise about the fisheries realities. Likewise, this serious deficiency in the composition of the platform puts into question the legitimacy and validity of the work delivered by the expert group for fisheries,’ said Europêche president Javier Garat.

‘We note with concern that the European Commission has ignored our call to re-open the expert group’ member list to industry representatives (fishing vessel owners, producer organisations, trade unions, specialised financial services, fish processing companies and retailers). Regrettably, the debates and discussions held within the Platform are not disclosed nor publicly available.’

The industry points out that the European Commission has a duty to consult relevant EU Advisory councils specialised in fisheries, before submitting any “expert” outcome to the scrutiny of the public or as a recommendation to the European Commission.

‘European fishers are global leaders in sustainability, and we are more than interested in documenting and proving this fact. But the effect of this lack of expertise can be read throughout the sections in the report and annex concerning fishing with unworkable criteria and unachievable targets that go way beyond existing EU legislation, internationally agreed standards and the fishery reality,’ said Esben Sverdrup-Jensen, President of EAPO.

‘These include 100% observers on board, no-take zones, no discards and rejection by definition of bottom trawling as a sustainable activity. As a result, the vast majority of the EU fishing industry will not be able to reach alignment with the criteria, especially small-scale artisanal vessels.’

The two organisations have issued a joint declaration, stating that it’s a strange situation when the NGOs participating in the expert group (and the European Commission at this stage) are reluctant to reform the current CFP basic regulation while, in the taxonomy, NGOs propose the introduction of completely new standards based on cherry-picking science.

To the point that some of the studies referenced as scientific basis are, in reality, reports conducted by the very same NGOs participating in the expert group (e.g., Birdlife, Bycatch Mitigation FACT-SHEETS 2014), they point out.

Isn’t it biased that a member of the platform is quoting its own study to underpin the recommended policy criteria? Isn’t this a conflict of interests? We can only conclude that the proposed criteria appear is a “wish list” of NGO claims that tried without success to insert them in other EU legislative acts (such as fisheries control regulation, multiannual management plans) and now, once again, within the framework of the taxonomy without any real debate.

Europêche and EAPO also question the auditability of the proposed criteria. Particularly given the fact that the bodies providing scientific advice to the EU do not provide the level of detail for the information required under the screening criteria.

While appreciating the timely updates on the state of play of taxonomy by DG MARE, the industry fails to understand how and why the Directorate on financial affairs (DG FISMA) did not request any stakeholder representation from the fisheries value chain at any point, they state.

Author: Quentin Bates / FiskerForum 
[email protected]


Click to know how to advertise in FIS
Papua New Guinea
Sep 26, 07:00 (GMT + 9):
First seafood PNG seafood holding facility opens in Singapore
Sep 26, 06:00 (GMT + 9):
'Gov’t provides funding to help deep sea fishing industry players': Minister Ronald
Sep 26, 01:10 (GMT + 9):
Sep 26, 01:00 (GMT + 9):
Indonesia explores strengthening of cooperation in fishery with Russia
Sep 26, 01:00 (GMT + 9):
SalmonChile companies invested US$ 11.5 million in R&D projects
Sep 26, 01:00 (GMT + 9):
Mexico and Ecuador maintain trade disagreement on tuna and shrimp
Sep 26, 01:00 (GMT + 9):
Conxemar: `The commercial and logistical challenges in the fishing industry'
Sep 26, 00:50 (GMT + 9):
Migration prevision │ Fraser river │ Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) │ 2022
Sep 26, 00:40 (GMT + 9):
Daily catch │ Chum salmon │ Hokkaido │ until Sep-20
Russian Federation
Sep 26, 00:40 (GMT + 9):
Statistics │ Catch │ Pacific salmon: pink, chum, sockeye, coho, king │ 1988-2022
Sep 26, 00:30 (GMT + 9):
Monthly handling │ Ikura │ Hokaido and Tokyo│ by origin │ 2021-22
Sep 26, 00:30 (GMT + 9):
Volume and prices │ Salmon roe: Sujiko and Ikura │ Tokyo Central Fish Market │ 2021-22
Sep 26, 00:30 (GMT + 9):
Volumes and prices │ Frozen and salted salmon │ Tokyo Fish Central Market | 2021-22
South Korea
Sep 26, 00:10 (GMT + 9):
Statistics │ Import by origin │Crab │ Aug-2022
United Kingdom
Sep 26, 00:00 (GMT + 9):
Other Media | Fish Farmer: Mowi will appeal Loch Hourn planning decision

PNIPA: More than 500 artisanal fishermen from Sechura will benefit from the export of clams and navajuelas to Taiwan and Chile
Peru PRODUCE program co-finances projects that allow compliance with sanitary standards throughout the value chain of these bivalve molluscs.   Export value of canned navajuelas and clams will be US...
Peru The Fishing Law of Peru was sanctioned by Law 25,977 of December 7, 1992 and Supreme Decree 012-2001-PE. This country represents 8% of world catches and is number one in Latin America, which is why...
First Of Trawler Series Sails From St Petersburg Yard
Russia Fed. The first of a series of high-tech factory trawlers built in Russia for the Russian Fishery Company has sailed from the Admiralty Shipyard in St Petersburg. A farewell ceremony for 108 metre LOA, 21 ...
'Gov’t provides funding to help deep sea fishing industry players': Minister Ronald
Malaysia The government is providing assistance, including funding through Agrobank, that can be used by deep sea fishing industry players to modernise vessels and fishing mechanisms, said Agriculture and Food...

Maruha Nichiro Corporation
Nichirei Corporation - Headquarters
Pesquera El Golfo S.A.
Ventisqueros - Productos del Mar Ventisqueros S.A
Wärtsilä Corporation - Wartsila Group Headquarters
ITOCHU Corporation - Headquarters
BAADER - Nordischer Maschinenbau Rud. Baader GmbH+Co.KG (Head Office)
Inmarsat plc - Global Headquarters
Marks & Spencer
Tesco PLC (Supermarket) - Headquarters
Sea Harvest Corporation (PTY) Ltd. - Group Headquarters
I&J - Irvin & Johnson Holding Company (Pty) Ltd.
AquaChile S.A. - Group Headquarters
Pesquera San Jose S.A.
Nutreco N.V. - Head Office
CNFC China National Fisheries Corporation - Group Headquarters
W. van der Zwan & Zn. B.V.
SMMI - Sunderland Marine Mutual Insurance Co., Ltd. - Headquarters
Icicle Seafoods, Inc
Starkist Seafood Co. - Headquearters
Trident Seafoods Corp.
American Seafoods Group LLC - Head Office
Marel - Group Headquarters
SalMar ASA - Group Headquarters
Sajo Industries Co., Ltd
Hansung Enterprise Co.,Ltd.
BIM - Irish Sea Fisheries Board (An Bord Iascaigh Mhara)
CEFAS - Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science
COPEINCA ASA - Corporacion Pesquera Inca S.A.C.
Chun Cheng Fishery Enterprise Pte Ltd.
VASEP - Vietnam Association of Seafood Exporters & Producers
Gomes da Costa
Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. (Headquarters)
NISSUI - Nippon Suisan Kaisha, Ltd. - Group Headquarters
FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization - Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Headquarter)
Hagoromo Foods Co., Ltd.
Koden Electronics Co., Ltd. (Headquarters)
A.P. Møller - Maersk A/S - Headquarters
BVQI - Bureau Veritas Quality International (Head Office)
UPS - United Parcel Service, Inc. - Headquarters
Brim ehf (formerly HB Grandi Ltd) - Headquarters
Hamburg Süd Group - (Headquearters)
Armadora Pereira S.A. - Grupo Pereira Headquarters
Costa Meeresspezialitäten GmbH & Co. KG
NOAA - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Headquarters)
Mowi ASA (formerly Marine Harvest ASA) - Headquarters
Marubeni Europe Plc -UK-
Findus Ltd
Icom Inc. (Headquarter)
WWF Centroamerica
Oceana Group Limited
The David and Lucile Packard Foundation
Ajinomoto Co., Inc. - Headquarters
Friosur S.A. - Headquarters
Cargill, Incorporated - Global Headquarters
Benihana Inc.
Leardini Pescados Ltda
CJ Corporation  - Group Headquarters
Greenpeace International - The Netherlands | Headquarters
David Suzuki Foundation
Fisheries and Oceans Canada -Communications Branch-
Mitsui & Co.,Ltd - Headquarters
NOREBO Group (former Ocean Trawlers Group)
Natori Co., Ltd.
Carrefour Supermarket - Headquarters
FedEx Corporation - Headquarters
Cooke Inc. - Group Headquarters
AKBM - Aker BioMarine ASA
Seafood Choices Alliance -Headquarter-
Austevoll Seafood ASA
Walmart | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Supermarket) - Headquarters
New Japan Radio Co.Ltd (JRC) -Head Office-
Gulfstream JSC
Marine Stewardship Council - MSC Worldwide Headquarters
Royal Dutch Shell plc (Headquarter)
Genki Sushi Co.,Ltd -Headquarter-
Iceland Pelagic ehf
AXA Assistance Argentina S.A.
Caterpillar Inc. - Headquarters
Tiger Brands Limited
National Geographic Society
AmazonFresh, LLC - AmazonFresh

Copyright 1995 - 2022 Seafood Media Group Ltd.| All Rights Reserved.   DISCLAIMER